Posted by Anne Onymous on Fri, 08/22/2003 - 10:57am.
Archived comment by Jon:
Yes, but there was the implication that no cheating in baseball would ever be acceptable, ever. Not even if the alternative was your family going hungry. If it's OK to make a distinction between bad or worse choices in the circumstances you cited, why is it different for the other circumstances?
Is it possible that the magnitude of the situation has a bearing on whether you can make that choice?
Reply
Your name:
Anne Onymous
Subject:
Comment:
Allowed HTML tags: <a> <b> <dd> <dl> <dt> <i> <li> <ol> <u> <ul> <em> <blockquote> <br> <hr> <br/>