Posted by Anne Onymous on Fri, 08/22/2003 - 10:13am.
Archived comment by Jon:
I'm still having trouble understanding the 'absolute morality' perspective. Once you declare all X is bad, always, the one time someone has to make a choice between bad choice X and worse choice Y, they're screwed. Right? They're bad either way, so they should do... what?
I'm still having trouble understanding the 'absolute morality' perspective. Once you declare all X is bad, always, the one time someone has to make a choice between bad choice X and worse choice Y, they're screwed. Right? They're bad either way, so they should do... what?